Last week I posed a provocative question and spent some time arguing against common sense. This article is going to be coming full-circle: advocating a more informed and precise version of common sense. First and foremost, Yes, touring really is nescessary in 2008. A number of readers have wondered: why did I phrase the question so vaguely?
I’m glad people caught that—it was deliberate, and central to the point of this series. Most people I talk to, from new artists to established pros, operate on the assumption that touring is nescessary, period. I would like people to seriously re-evaluate this embrace of tradition: screwdrivers are nescessary, too, but they’re not always the right tool for the job. In part two of this series, I established the fact that touring is not nescessary to “break” your act. In fact, it’s the least effective, most expensive method of introducing a new artist to a large audience.
In this final installment, I am going to examine what touring is nescessary for: generating media attention, connecting with your existing fanbase, and most importantly, making some damn money.
I was reading over
Audible Hype is all about questioning common sense and giving the Status Quo a good swift boot to the nuts. As many readers know, I’ve been on the road more or less constantly since last October, so live shows and touring have been at the forefront of my mind. I’ve got about 30 pages in my journal about how to tighten my operation—and yours—but before I get to that, I’d like to burn everything down first.
My name is Justin Boland and I work for