Sample Clearance: Hope Carr
Posted: 22 August 2008 10:28 AM   [ Ignore ]
Administrator
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  348
Joined  2007-10-20

SOURCE LINK: NYT

The Manhattan apartment is filled with bookshelves, but most of them don’t hold books. Instead, they overflow with albums—classical over here, jazz over there, and lots of soul and rock-and-roll in between. A parakeet named Adri flies around the living room offering guests, as the bird’s owner puts it, ‘’sweet gangsta kisses.’’ Most always there’s the steady thump thump of hip-hop blasting in the background.

You have entered the world of Hope Carr, who is known to her rap clientele, she says, as ‘’the white lady who clears samples.’’

Rappers, producers and record labels enlist her help in getting permission to use samples: the words and scraps of old funk, jazz, soul and pop that are recorded by other artists, then recycled and made a part of just about every new rap song on the charts. Ms. Carr spends her days listening to albums, cassettes, obscure 12-inch disco singles and CD’s and then tracking down publishers and recording companies.

‘’I live for this,’’ Ms. Carr said one morning as she prepared for another day of work. As is often the case, she had been sent a tape to vet but was not told specifically what to look for by the rappers themselves, who many times do not know the source of their borrowed material. ‘’I spent a whole day trying to figure out if someone was saying ‘Whoomp, there it is’ or ‘Whoot, there it is.’ ‘’ The distinction was critical because each was the chorus to a different song.

She finally figured out that the rappers weren’t saying either. ‘’They were saying ‘Hoop, there it is,’ ‘’ she said of the refrain, which was recorded for the soundtrack of Michael Jordan’s movie, ‘’Space Jam,’’ but ultimately not used.

It was Ms. Carr who also made sure that Naughty by Nature could borrow the hook from the Jackson Five’s ‘’ABC’’ for the rappers’ 1991 megahit ‘’O.P.P.’’ She cleared the bits and pieces of Minnie Riperton’s ‘’Memory Lane’’ and New Birth’s ‘’You Are What I’m All About’’ that the rappers Junior Mafia used in their song ‘’Player’s Anthem.’’ And she has vetted nearly every song recorded by the New Age rappers P. M. Dawn.

Prince Paul, who has produced performers like De La Soul, Queen Latifah and Vernon Reid, wishes he had had Ms. Carr’s expertise in 1989, when he produced his first album, ‘’Three Feet High and Rising,’’ by De La Soul. That album prompted a multimillion-dollar lawsuit because it sampled a Turtles song without permission. The case was eventually settled; for how much, Prince Paul wouldn’t say, but he said it was costly.

‘’One reason Hope comes in handy, he said, ‘’is labels don’t want to take that risk, so they ask a professional, ‘What do you think?’ Who knows? If we had cleared the Turtles, they might have said, ‘Oh, give us $2,000.’ Or they might have said, ‘Don’t use it at all.’ And that would have cleared up the whole problem.’’

When a sample is not cleared, a performer faces other risks. In 1992, the rapper Biz Markie was found to have used on an album, without permission, parts of Gilbert O’Sullivan’s 1972 hit song ‘’Alone Again (Naturally)’’ Warner Brothers, which distributed the rapper’s Cold Chillin’ label, was ordered to stop selling the album. ‘’That was sort of the turning point for people clearing stuff,’’ Ms. Carr said.

Rap has become one of the biggest-selling genres in pop music, and sampling, which along with driving beats and blustering poetry is a trademark of the music, has spawned its own cottage industry. Performers like George Clinton and James Brown were introduced to a new generation through the sampling of their music.

The minimum cost of using parts of a song has risen from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars. Investors have purchased music catalogues with the sole intention of selling the use of the songs to rap artists. The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, which collects royalties for songwriters and publishers, also expanded its sampling department to deal with rap.

Ms. Carr’s company, Clearance 13-8, has been clearing sampled music since 1989, and by now she is thoroughly conversant in the subject. She knows that samples of George Clinton, the mastermind behind Parliament Funkadelic, are still the rage among West Coast rappers and that Barry White is hot but very expensive. And ‘’no one samples James Brown anymore because it’s kind of passe,’’ she said. She also knows which artists others should steer clear of. The Eagles, the Beatles and Led Zeppelin, to name a few, rarely allow their music to be sampled.

For certain artists, sampling seems to have become another battlefront in the war over the morality of rap music. Anita Baker will simply not allow any of her songs to be sampled by rap artists, while James Brown forbids the sampling of his songs in raps about violence or drugs. ‘’He really doesn’t want to be involved in any kind of rap that demoralizes any segment of society,’’ said Larry Fridie, Mr. Brown’s special assistant.

Ms. Carr thinks that such disdain for sampling smacks of hypocrisy. ‘’I don’t think anyone thinks less of James Brown because of all the songs that have sampled his music,’’ she said. ‘’And if you have a movie with the foulest language, he’d be happy to have his songs in it.’’

With her tousled red hair and tortoise-shell glasses, Ms. Carr, 38, resembles a librarian more than a hip-hop connoisseur. A former tour manager for European pop artists, she happened into her specialty by accident. Back in 1989, her husband, Lawrence Stanley, then director of business affairs at Tommy Boy Records, a prominent rap label, asked her to clear songs for the ‘’De La Soul Is Dead’’ album.

‘’It was trial by fire because no one was really doing it,’’ she said, ‘’and there was no place to plug into.’’ She was shunted from the copyright to the legal affairs departments of the record labels and back again, she said, because many companies simply were not prepared to deal with this new facet of the music business. ‘’Now I call, and they know what I’m doing.’’

She charges $50 an hour and works as much as 70 hours a week from her apartment on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. Getting permission from the necessary parties can take months, and she is so busy that she has hired an assistant.

But it is a labor of love for Ms. Carr, whose tastes in music runs from Stravinsky to Wu-Tang Clan. ‘’One thing that appeals to me about hip-hop is its scavenger mentality,’’ she said. ‘’I’m delighted by the use of a song we’ve heard 400 times, and they’ve figured out a way to reloop it. Some of what people do in their home studios is amazing.’’

One afternoon, she flipped on a cassette that had been sent by B Rock and the Biz, an Atlanta group. The music, in her words, was ‘’your basic booty rap.’’ The feverish beat of a new ditty called ‘’My Babydaddy’’ boomed through the living room, and Ms. Carr went to work.

It turned out that the rap had lifted a huge chunk of Cheryl Lynn’s 1979 hit, ‘’Got to Be Real.’’ Because the rap used the main beat of Ms. Lynn’s actual recording, Ms. Carr had to contact the publisher of the original composition as well as the record company, both of whom would have to be paid for its use. She reached for one of her most important tools, a copy of a compilation by the Japanese disk jockey Toshinobu Kubota, to find out who owned the song.

Whether it is two seconds or two minutes, a familiar hook or groove usually requires clearance. ‘’Really what it is is recognizability,’’ she said. A rap group used just the ‘’good’’ from the refrain of the 1979 disco hit ‘’Good Times’’ by Chic, and the artist had to pay for using the lyric.

Publishers require payment for the use of the composition—the copyrighted music and lyrics of a song. Generally they demand 50 percent of the new song’s profits. When an artist digitally samples an actual recording, record companies also want compensation, usually asking for a minimum fee in the thousands of dollars, plus an additional payment if the record sells more than a certain number of copies.

Because the cost is so high, ‘’more people are doing songs without samples or trying to make songs where the samples are so obscure you don’t hear them,’’ said Ms. Carr, who works with her clients to determine what they can borrow and not pay for without getting caught.

Industry insiders like Peter LoFrumento, a consultant to ASCAP, sees rappers relying less on samples and more on their own creations. ‘’There was a point where sampling was very popular in the business, and everybody was sampling something,’’ he said. ‘’I think that’s kind of come and gone.’’

Ms. Carr maintains that sampling is creative in its own right. Even classical musicians, she said, have used tape loops to create a new sound out of previously recorded melodies. But rap has been the primary musical form to use sampling.

‘’This is a technological advance in the way music is made,’’ she said. ‘’It’s no different from collage, and that’s a perfectly acceptable art form.’’

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 August 2008 10:28 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Administrator
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  348
Joined  2007-10-20

SOURCE LINK: REMIX

LICENSED TO ILL

Jun 1, 2002 12:00 PM, By Markkus Rovito

DJ-mix CDs don’t just happen overnight. Unlike mix tapes, CD compilations are not a matter of a DJ getting loose, recording the set and releasing the results. Although DJs often have the freedom to choose the tracks on the mix, behind the scenes, the record label issuing the CD has to license every track for which it does not already hold the rights. Each licensing deal requires a price negotiation, a promise that all samples have been cleared and a contract. Licensing snafus can lead to legal entanglements, last-minute changes in the studio and disruptions in the production schedule. Whether you’re just beginning to make tracks, already releasing material or thinking about starting a label, the more you know about the business of licensing, the better off you’ll be.

ANATOMY OF A MIX

For Harry “Choo Choo” Romero’s Subliminal Sessions Two (Subliminal) double-CD released in February, Steve Huome — who handles international affairs and licensing for Subliminal — began licensing the tracks in early December. Subliminal only had the rights to about half of the 28 cuts slated for inclusion on the album. Huome had to wrap up the licensing deals for the remaining tracks in about 10 days so that Romero could record the mix and the label could begin promoting it within the crucial six-to-eight-week window before the release date. “There’s a lot of paperwork that goes into every single deal,” says Huome. Often, tracks will require two or more negotiations each, because Subliminal may have to get the rights for different countries separately.

Creating the final tracklist for a mix CD is a balancing act among a DJ’s artistic freedom, financial constraints and timing. Although Romero had complete freedom to choose the tracks he wanted for Subliminal Sessions Two, he says he always had to consider the logistics of licensing the tracks he wanted to compile. “I’ll get advance copies of records from DJs I have a relationship with,” says Romero, “but you got to consider the release dates for those tracks.” For example, he wanted to use “Freak” by Josh Wink, but it wasn’t coming out early enough to include. Romero also had his sights on the acappella of Pink’s “I’m Coming Up” but could not obtain it. “With major labels, they don’t want to hear it,” Romero says. “If you’re only going to be selling about 40,000 CDs, it’s not going to happen.”

Another reason some tracks are unattainable is costly licensing fees. But, occasionally, exceptions are made, and the money is spent. “You don’t want to be turning tracks down just because it’s an expense thing,” says Romero. “The aim of the game is to get your licenses, advances and royalties down as low as you can without losing the quality of the record.” Every compilation CD has a budget to follow based on what the label thinks it can sell. If the label is anticipating selling 30,000 copies, for example, Huome says it would want to keep the royalties to an average of 10 cents per track per album, or a total of $1.50 to $1.80 per album, and the artist advances should be about $750 to $1,000 per track. “If one company wants to charge a high royalty,” says Huome, “you try to balance that with one of the smaller labels that’s got a cool track no one’s picked up on yet.”

When a label wants to license a track, it sends a Heads of Agreement form to the original label. That form outlines the proposed terms of the deal, including the advance, the royalty and the territory of the license, such as North America or the United Kingdom. At this point, the original label either agrees to the terms or opts to negotiate, according to Nick McGeachin, manager for trance DJ D:Fuse. McGeachin licensed all of the tracks on D:Fuse’s mix double-CD People (V2 Records) released in February. “The label that accepts the offer in the Heads of Agreement also accepts that they are responsible for all third-party samples,” McGeachin says. That protects the licensing label from liability should any questions arise about the legal use of samples. Also, the Heads of Agreement that McGeachin used to license tracks for People did not guarantee inclusion on the finished mix. It stated, “You acknowledge that final track selection is at the DJ’s discretion, and signature hereof does not guarantee track inclusion in final compilation.” The reason for that is simple: Labels often try to attain agreements for a few more tracks than the DJ will actually use. That also allows the DJ a degree of flexibility in the final programming of the mix.

NIGHTMARES ON WAX

Even with the most careful preparation, problems with licensing do crop up. During the making of People, McGeachin dealt with several troubling anomalies. One involved a label that made a verbal agreement with McGeachin to license a song, but before finalizing the agreement, that label turned around and licensed the track to Sony America. “When I went to Sony,” McGeachin says, “they asked for an outrageous amount of money. So, here you’re stepping on the artist’s toes because of financial restrictions. The fact is, that label in the UK should have realized it was about to be licensed to Sony for North American rights. That can’t have happened overnight.”

Uncleared samples can also cause all kinds of headaches. Before V2 Records put out People, it sent the record to Clearance 13’-8” (a “trainspotting agency,” says McGeachin) to scan the music for potentially uncleared samples. Hope Carr was the person listening, and out of a list of questionable samples, two of them actually caused problems. One turned out to be a vocal sample from the Sopranos, though the track’s author claimed it was from an old sci-fi movie. “If I would have had to go to Warner Brothers,” says McGeachin, “they either would have said no or they would have known the situation we were in and shafted us.” Instead, D:Fuse replaced the sample by recording his own voice saying the same words. He sent this recording to Oakland-based producer Moda, who meticulously removed the offending sample in Digidesign Pro Tools. McGeachin says that is absolutely legal: “It’s like quoting poetry at that point.” But D:Fuse did receive written permission from the track’s author.

Another track included an uncleared vocal sample from an obscure 1979 disco track that turned out to be owned by Polygram. The track’s label said it had no idea, and the track’s artist swore he lifted the vocal from a white label and had no idea what it was. It took another studio session by Moda to fix that problem. Even though he had a Heads of Agreement from the label, McGeachin says, “We were left with no other option than to remove the track and reprogram the mix.”

Subliminal recently ran into a situation in which it found one of its tracks, which had not been licensed, on a compilation. The twist was that the track’s artist had licensed it to another label before Subliminal, and that label in turn licensed it to a third label. “So it’s this whole mess,” says Huome, “and you’re talking about, literally, $1,000 at stake. Is it really worth getting all bent out of shape over? So we’re going to try to have these people give us a remix for free. There are all kinds of strange, crazy deals like this taking place. It’s always better to do a deal rather than going all legal on people, but major labels especially tend to be looking to nail each other with a legal suit. Every label has a lawyer these days.”

Ned Hearn, a San Jose, Calif.-based entertainment lawyer who represents independent and major labels as well as individual musicians, says that probably 95 to 99 percent of those types of copyright infringement claims get settled out of court because the cost of litigation would be out of proportion to the money at stake. “If it is a clear infringement and you’re the plaintiff, you’ve basically got the leverage,” he says.

Another potential legal dispute arises when a compilation comes out and someone claims a sample on a track has not been cleared. “The person who put the compilation together is relying on the owner that they didn’t infringe on anyone else’s rights,” says Hearn. “The person who put out the compilation could be named as a defendant, but the ultimate liability would be on the original artist who did not clear the sample.”

Therefore, the onus is on producers to know their legal responsibilities before they begin licensing or selling their tracks. Hearn recommends that anytime musicians are asked to make a commitment by signing a document and they’re not certain about what they’re signing, they should consult with a lawyer. Also, if artists have little or no label or management support and they want to better understand the economics and business details of the industry, an entertainment lawyer could help.

PIMPIN’ OUT

The other side of licensing is sending out tracks for other labels to use. Subliminal puts out about 50 tracks per year, and it has 150 top DJs it sends records to and a mailing list of about 50 labels to notify that the tracks are available. Subliminal recording artists, such as Romero, always have final say as to whether their tracks get licensed out. Romero says nine times out of 10, he’ll license out his tracks. “But if it’s a wack DJ making a wack compilation, it’s not gonna fly,” he says. “It’s got to be a recognized DJ and a recognized label; otherwise, what’s the point?”

Huome expanded on that, saying, “We don’t really want to be on these really cheesy, commercial, idiotic records, because we have to maintain our credibility.” Subliminal gets its fair share of license requests but has to turn down some of the lowball offers. “I had one from South Africa for $200,” says Huome. “Now, that might be a lot of money there — we totally understand that — but we have to pay half of that to our artist. And we also have to pay a legal cost because every deal eventually goes through our lawyer. So, in the end, you’ve actually paid to do the license. We also want to deal with labels that are straight. If a label’s known for giving the runaround, we don’t have time to run around with them.”

Cases also exist in which Subliminal isn’t allowed to license out records. It recently had the rights for a major-label artist’s 12-inch, but the major label wouldn’t let Subliminal put it on any compilations. “We told them ‘Look, you must be crazy,’” Huome says. “‘Your record’s looking like a flop because it’s not showing up on Carl Cox’s album, Oakenfold’s album and the major DJ albums.’ So the majors still haven’t really got what a dance compilation is. They think it’s going to sell 100,000 because their record’s on it. You know, that’s not the case.”

IT’S WHO YOU KNOW

Nick McGeachin wears several hats in the dance-music industry. He manages D:Fuse and Moda, does artist relations for Allen & Heath and fits in some production work. He also helps run CD Pool American, a subscription service for DJs. He puts unreleased tracks on a CD sampler every four to six weeks and then shops those tracks to labels he has contacts with in the United Kingdom for potential licensing. “It’s really hit or miss,” McGeachin says about licensing. “There’s a lot of stuff I know is good, but the market is saturated.” One recent success story he’s had was the Scanners track “Prayer,” owned by Glasgow label Limbo. It ended up on D:Fuse’s People compilation, and D:Fuse did a remix that V2 Records/MTA and Limbo released with the original track on vinyl. The record made its debut on the Billboard dance charts at No. 46 and made its way to Carl Cox’s top 10.

McGeachin handles progressive house and trance only, which is where his expertise lies. Should a track be licensed, his cut is 15 percent of the up-front fee and 15 percent of the royalties. “That’s pretty much the industry standard,” he says. You can send your MP3s to McGeachin (), but he recommends sending only tracks of high production quality. “I can virtually guarantee I’ll have a listen,” he says. “I’ll scan through it, and if I like it, I’ll take a closer look.”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 August 2008 11:22 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Administrator
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  348
Joined  2007-10-20

Source link: PMP

PROTECT YOURSELF

Whether you are a manager, artist, producer, agent or label executive, receiving the proper compensation for the effort and
resources invested in your product is of utmost priority. This is what separates the hobbyist from the professional. The Production Market Place was borne out of the need for an official online platform when it comes to the selling and purchasing of quality tracks. With the advancement of technology it is of great importance that you do everything within your means to protect your investment. Below is a basic check off list which we will continue to add on to as the PMP Community grows.

PRODUCERS

* Copyright all material prior to making it available for buyers on the PMP to listen to. Fill out an SR form and submit it along with a non-returnable copy of the music and $45.00 to the following address:

Library of Congress
Copyright Office
101 Independence Avenue, S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20559-6000

* Before accepting any monetary or equal value barter exchange for your instrumental insure the transaction is made official by having all parties involved sign an agreement that spells out the terms and limitations.
* Though not mandatory it is highly recommended that you retain the services of an attorney who can be of great assistance when it comes to legal advice and direction, interpreting agreements/documents and leveraging industry influence to help secure deals.

BUYERS

* If necessary request sample clearance information from the producer prior to purchasing an instrumental. While you shouldn’t depend on this information as your only method for identifying samples you may have to clear, it’s a great starting point.
* A producer’s track record is one of the key factors in price negotiation so when feasible do the necessary research to verify they’ve been credited according to what they’re stating.
* As with any business transaction request a receipt from the producer you’re purchasing the instrumental from for proof of sale and tax purposes.

DOWNLOADABLE FORMS

* SR Form (copyright): http://www.copyright.gov/forms/formsr.pdf

USEFUL LINKS

* ASCAP: http://www.ascap.com
* BMI: http://www.bmi.com
* Sound Exchange: http://www.soundexchange.com
* Copyright: http://www.copyright.gov

Profile